Summary of Outreach to States on TANF Caseloads and Case Management Services: Jefferson County, Colorado Department of Human Services

Record Description
In December 2011, representatives from the Jefferson County Department of Human Services, Career and Family Support Services, Colorado Works and Child Care Assistance Program contacted the Welfare Peer TA (WPTA) Network for assistance in determining the optimal number of cases each TANF caseworker should maintain, so that an appropriate amount of time and attention can be paid to all participants to assist them in achieving higher levels of economic self-sufficiency. In response to Jefferson County’s TA Request, the WPTA team conducted information gathering outreach to 10 of the largest cities in the country (New York, New York; Los Angeles, California; Chicago, Illinois; Houston, Texas; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Phoenix, Arizona; San Antonio, Texas; San Diego, California; Dallas, Texas; and San Jose, California). This data provided Colorado and other States a greater understanding of optimal caseload sizes for TANF offices, and of caseload sizes per TANF eligibility workers versus case managers. The Technical Assistance Summary associated with this effort provides a high-level overview of TANF caseload sizes among the 10 highlighted metropolitan areas. It also provides insight into staffing structure, caseload size designation, characteristics of staff and participants, caseload manageability, caseload assignments, caseload demographic information, workload and responsibilities of staff, curricula and training, as well as barriers and challenges faced by the TANF programs.
Record Type
Posting Date
Combined Date
2012-12-31T19:00:00
Source
Region
City/County
Publication Date
2013-01-01
Upload Files
Attachment Size
Summary Report 1.12 MB

Understanding the Dynamics of Disconnection From Employment and Assistance

Record Description

The Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation released a report that summarizes interview data collected from 51 unmarried mothers in Southeast Michigan and Los Angeles, California. Interviews were conducted to learn about participant experiences with work, benefit receipt, overall wellbeing, material hardship, and economic coping strategies that are utilized.

Record Type
Posting Date
Combined Date
2014-05-31T20:00:00
Source
Region
City/County
Publication Date
2014-06-01

State Supervised/County Administered TANF Programs Roundtable

Record Description

In response to a technical assistance request from the Minnesota Department of Human Services pertaining to gaining a more clear understanding of the different state supervised/county administered models, the Peer Technical Assistance Network organized a peer-to-peer roundtable in Chicago, Illinois on July 18-19, 2012 with directors and staff from state supervised/county administered Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) programs. This report describes the technical assistance request and response, as well as the overall findings from the roundtable event and lays out potential recommendations for future discussions about the state supervised/county administered structure.

Record Type
Posting Date
Combined Date
2012-06-30T20:00:00
Source
City/County
Publication Date
2012-07-01
Upload Files
Attachment Size
Final Report 1012.2 KB

Understanding the dynamics of disconnection from employment and assistance: Final report

Record Description

Since the creation of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) in 1996, there has been concern about low-income individuals who may be eligible for TANF cash assistance but are neither receiving TANF nor working. These individuals are often referred to as “disconnected.” This study, Understanding the Dynamics of Disconnection from Employment and Assistance, uses interview data from a sample of 51 disconnected, unmarried mothers from Southeast Michigan and Los Angeles, California, to learn more about their experiences related to work, benefit receipt, and material hardship, the economic coping strategies they use to manage, and their overall well-being. (author abstract) 

Record Type
Posting Date
Combined Date
2013-12-31T19:00:00
Source
Region
City/County
Publication Date
2014-01-01
Innovative Programs

Center for Employment Opportunities

Mission/Goal of Program

The Center for Employment Opportunities (CEO) began as a demonstration project of the Vera Institute of Justice in the 1970s to address employment barriers facing individuals after their release from incarceration. In 1996, CEO became an independent 501(c)3 nonprofit organization, providing comprehensive employment services to people newly released from New York State prisons and detention facilities. CEO operates in 22 cities across eight states and have made more than 30,000 placements into full-time employment for individuals who were formerly incarcerated.

Programs/Services Offered

To offer work experience, CEO operates transitional work crews that provide supplemental indoor/outdoor maintenance and neighborhood beautification services to more than 40 customers across the U.S. CEO guarantees every participant who completes a one-week job-readiness orientation up to four days a week of transitional work on a crew and daily pay. In addition to work and daily pay, CEO provides a robust set of wraparound vocational support services: on days participants are not working, they receive job coaching to find full-time employment.

  • Job-Readiness Training: prepare people for success in the workplace
  • Transitional Employment: provide immediate paid work experience
  • Job Coaching & Placement: connect talented employees with quality employers
  • Retention Services: provide ongoing support to ensure our participants succeed

CEO's program was independently evaluated by the US Department of Health and Human Services, which found that for individuals recently released from incarceration, participation in CEO resulted in lower rates on all measures of recidivism, including arrests, convictions and returns to jail or prison. Convictions of a crime fell by over 22 percent and re-incarceration for a new crime fell over 26 percent.

Start Date
Monday, January 1, 1996
Type of Agency/Organization
Community-based Organization
City
New York
State
California
Colorado
Kentucky
Louisiana
Michigan
New York
North Carolina
Ohio
Oklahoma
Pennsylvania
Tennessee
Geographic Reach
Multistate
Clientele/Population Served
100 Percent Former offenders
Topics/Subtopics
Employment
Job Readiness
Special Populations
Incarcerated and Individuals with a Criminal Record
Innovative Programs

KEYS (Keeping Employment equals Your Success) Auto Loan Program

Mission/Goal of Program

The KEYS Auto Loan Program is the Employment & Human Services Department’s (EHSD) low-interest auto loan program intended to provide auto loans to help employed CalWORKs participants in Contra Costa County, to purchase a vehicle. The loan has a maximum dollar amount of $7,000 and up to a 3-year term (Loans over $6,000 carry a 3- year term; loans below $6,000 carry a 2-to-3-year loan term.) This auto loan program targets those participants for whom an automobile is the only practical means of transportation to employment or training, and who would otherwise not be able to obtain an auto loan.

Programs/Services Offered

The KEYS Auto Loan Program is the Employment & Human Services Department’s (EHSD) low-interest auto loan program for employed CalWORKs participants who have difficulty obtaining an auto loan from other sources.

Referral to the KEYS program is through the CalWORKs participant’s EHSD case manager.

In its 20+ years as a program KEYS has provided 150 loans to CalWORKs participants in Contra Costa County to assist them in maintaining their employment. The program has a maximum loan amount of $7,000.00 and an average monthly loan payment of $180.00 a month. All vehicles financed through the program are diagnostically inspected by a certified mechanic at no cost to the loan participant. The program also provides budget management material to all loan participants as well as car maintenance on their vehicle that they finance through KEYS.

Responses from the participants in the program were very positive.

Start Date
Wednesday, January 1, 2003
Type of Agency/Organization
Other Public Agency
City
Martinez
State
California
Geographic Reach
Onesite
Clientele/Population Served
Active CALWORKS participants in Contra Costa County
Topics/Subtopics
Transportation
Car Purchase Programs
Supportive Services
Post-employment Supports

Investing in Youth and the Community: Summer Youth Employment Programs

Record Description

On Wednesday, May 7, 2014, the Office of Family Assistance's Peer TA Network, along with partners from the U.S. Departments of Labor, and Housing and Urban Development, hosted the Investing in Youth and the Community: Summer Youth Employment Programs Webinar. This Webinar explored emerging initiatives, partnerships, and strategies for implementing summer youth employment programs. The Webinar highlighted federal, state, private, and public services available to engage youth in summer employment, while also providing TANF-serving organizations and other stakeholders with the opportunity to learn how to engage various partners in support of summer youth employment activities. Presenters included representatives from Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago, Brandeis University's Center for Youth and Communities, and the Denver Public Housing Authority's Youth Employment Academy.

 

As a followup to this presentation, OFA created a series of Summer Youth Employment Program Profiles – providing more in-depth information on the background, program model, lessons learned, outcomes, and successes for a number of programs engaging youth in summer employment. These profiles highlight the activities of the City of Richmond, Department of Employment and Training's YouthWORKS Division; the City of Buffalo, Buffalo Employment and Training Center; and the Denver Housing Authority’s Youth Employment Academy.

Record Type
Posting Date
Combined Date
2014-05-07T10:00:00
Source
City/County
Publication Date
2014-05-01
Section/Feed Type
PeerTA Resources (OFA Initiatives)
Upload Files
Question / Response(s)

Question from California Jobs and Employment Services Department

Question Text

What is the difference between low income parents and low income custodial parents? More specifically, how much more money can a custodial parent earn and still be considered "low-income" as compared to someone without a child?

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Date
June 2004
Source
OFA Peer TA
Agency/Organization
Jobs and Employment Services Department
State
California
Topics/Subtopics
Special Populations
TANF Regulatory Codes
Question / Response(s)

Question from California Health and Human Services

Question Text

A representative from the California Health and Human Services would like to know how Administrative Law Judges are interpreting the word "fugitive" when trying to determine whether an applicant is eligible for TANF benefits?

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Date
May 2014
Source
OFA Peer TA
Agency/Organization
California HHS
State
California
Topics/Subtopics
Special Populations
Incarcerated and Individuals with a Criminal Record
TANF Program Administration
Case Management
TANF Regulatory Codes

Evaluation of the life skills training program Los Angeles County, California: Final report

Record Description

Approximately 510,000 children lived in out-of-home care on September 30, 2006, the most recent date for which national estimates are available. In fiscal year 2006, over 26,000 youths remained in care until they were legally “emancipated” to “independent living,” usually due to reaching the age of majority or upon graduation from high school. On average, these youth have limited education and employment experience, relatively poor mental and physical health, and a relatively high likelihood of experiencing unwanted outcomes such as homelessness, incarceration, and nonmarital pregnancy.

The Foster Care Independence Act of 1999 amended Title IV-E to create the John Chafee Foster Care Independence Program (CFCIP), giving states more funding and greater flexibility in providing support to youth making the transition to independent living. It also required evaluation of such services. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Children’s Bureau contracted with the Urban Institute and its partners—the Chapin Hall Center for Children and the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago—to conduct this evaluation. The goal of this study is to determine the effects of the programs funded under CFCIP in achieving key outcomes for youth. Four programs are being evaluated under this contract. The subject of this report is the Life Skills Training (LST) program of Los Angeles County.

The evaluation consists of two components: an impact study involving three in-person interviews over two years and a process study. The sample consists of youths who were in out-of-home care placements and were 17 years old at the time of assignment, eligible for Chafee services, and deemed appropriate for Life Skills Training. A total of 482 youths were deemed eligible for the evaluation and 234 were assigned to the LST (treatment) group, while 248 youths were assigned to the control group. At the baseline, 97 percent of eligible cases were interviewed, and 88 percent of these were interviewed at the second follow-up. Overall, 76.5 percent of the 234 youths in the LST group enrolled in an LST classroom module, 70.1 percent attended a session, and 65 percent graduated from a module. (author abstract)

Record Type
Posting Date
Combined Date
2007-12-31T19:00:00
Source
Region
City/County
Publication Date
2008-01-01