Increasing Outreach, Connection, and Services to Low-Income, Non-Custodial Fathers: How Did We Get Here and What Do We Know

Record Description
This paper documents an approach, used in Connecticut, for outreaching, connecting, and serving low-income, ethnically diverse, non-custodial fathers. The approach focuses on engaging men "where they are" by building their strengths and addressing their needs and helping fathers become positive and healthy role models by increasing their attachment to their children and families. The approach focuses on skill development in several areas, including education, economic stability, family/child support, and mental and physical health.
Record Type
Combined Date
2012-03-31T20:00:00
Source
Region
City/County
Publication Date
2012-04-01
Question / Response(s)

Question from Wisconsin Department of Children and Families

Question Text

A representative from the Wisconsin Department of Children and Families would like to know if any states provide cash incentives to noncustodial parents (NCP's) as a component of TANF employment programs?

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Date
September 2012
Source
OFA Peer TA
Agency/Organization
Wisconsin Department of Children and Families
State
Wisconsin
Topics/Subtopics
Special Populations
Non-custodial Parents
TANF Program Administration
TANF Regulatory Codes
Question / Response(s)

Question from Tennessee Department of Human Services

Question Text

Are any states using TANF or MOE funds to provide cash assistance and/or support services to non-custodial parents?

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Date
June 2006
Source
OFA Peer TA
Agency/Organization
Tennessee Department of Human Services
State
Tennessee
Topics/Subtopics
Special Populations
Non-custodial Parents
TANF Regulatory Codes
Question / Response(s)

Question from Peer TA

Question Text

The Peer TA Network would like to hear innovative approaches States are using to work with non-custodial parents?

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Date
October 1999
Source
OFA Peer TA
Agency/Organization
icf
State
Arizona
Topics/Subtopics
Special Populations
Non-custodial Parents
TANF Regulatory Codes
Question / Response(s)

Question from PeerTA

Question Text

The Peer TA Network would like to know how TANF funds may be used to provide services for non-custodial parents?

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Date
June 1999
Source
OFA Peer TA
Agency/Organization
icf
State
North Carolina
Topics/Subtopics
Special Populations
Non-custodial Parents
TANF Program Administration
TANF Regulatory Codes
Question / Response(s)

Question from PeerTA

Question Text

The Peer TA Network would like to know which States charge application and other fees for IV-D services? How much is the fee? Are the fees charged to the custodial or noncustodial parent? Does the State absorb the fee?

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Date
April 1999
Source
OFA Peer TA
Agency/Organization
smith
Topics/Subtopics
Supportive Services
Child Support
Special Populations
Non-custodial Parents
TANF Program Administration
TANF Regulatory Codes

Strengthening TANF and Low-Income Families through Strategic Non-Custodial Supports

Record Description

On December 12, 2013, the Administration for Children and Families (ACF), Region X held a webinar, "Strengthening TANF and Low-Income Families through Strategic Non-Custodial Supports." The webinar, open to State TANF Directors and staff, local TANF agencies, and contractors, focused on how promoting the financial and personal responsibility of non-custodial parents (NCPs) can increase their participation in the lives of their children, improve their employment and career path outcomes, and improve the long-term outlook for children in single-parent families. The presenters highlighted specific programs and provided an overview of innovative ways to serve NCPs, improve their engagement with TANF families, and develop partnerships that meet their needs.

Record Type
Posting Date
Combined Date
2013-12-12T09:00:00
Source
OFA Initiatives
SFS Category
Region
City/County
Publication Date
2013-12-01

Falling further behind? Child support arrears and fathers' labor force participation

Record Description

This study examines how child support arrears affect fathers’ labor force participation. It relies on longitudinal data from the Fragile Families and Child Well-Being Study. Findings from analyses of these data suggest that child support arrears result in declines in average weeks worked in the formal labor market in subsequent time periods. These findings are driven by the behaviors of fathers who had relatively high amounts of arrears and no income in the previous year and are mostly robust to tests for selection into no work or low levels of work by fathers. Findings also suggest that arrears obligations that are low relative to income result in increases in the probability that fathers engage in any formal work. Arrears are not statistically significantly related to informal labor force participation. This study highlights both intended and unintended consequences of the growth in arrears under current child support enforcement policies. (author abstract).

Record Type
Posting Date
Combined Date
2012-01-01T00:00:00
Source
Region
City/County
Publication Date
2012-01-01

Kansas 529 Initiative for Noncustodial Parents

Record Description

The Assets for Independence (AFI) Resource Center released an article introducing and explaining the 529 plan. The State of Kansas is promoting savings for postsecondary education by offering this unique 529 plan for noncustodial parents. The 529 plans are investment accounts for postsecondary education expenses that may increase in value over time. Contributions to 529 plans may be deducted from income taxes. In the State of Kansas, under the Child Support Savings Incentive (CSSI) Program, eligible noncustodial parents can now open and contribute to 529 savings accounts for their children and receive a reduction in State child support arrears of double the amount deposited. For every one dollar saved towards their education, they receive a reduction in arrears of two dollars.

Record Type
Posting Date
Combined Date
2012-12-31T19:00:00
Source
Region
City/County
Publication Date
2013-01-01

Child support enforcement: Program basics

Record Description

The Child Support Enforcement (CSE) program was enacted in 1975 as a federal-state program (Title IV-D of the Social Security Act) to help strengthen families by securing financial support for children from their noncustodial parent on a consistent and continuing basis and by helping some families to remain self-sufficient and off public assistance by providing the requisite CSE services. Over the years, CSE has evolved into a multifaceted program. While cost-recovery still remains an important function of the program, its other aspects include service delivery and promotion of self-sufficiency and parental responsibility. In FY2012, the CSE program collected $27.7 billion in child support payments and served nearly 15.7 million child support cases. However, the program still collects only 63% of current child support obligations for which it has responsibility and collects payments for only 59% of its caseload. (author abstract)

Record Type
Posting Date
Combined Date
2013-09-12T00:00:00
Source
Region
City/County
Publication Date
2013-09-12